From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
pfee@talk21.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108301829.03121.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m37h5uddr2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 18:13:05, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> Pedro> I'm currently working towards adding (run control) ptset/itset
> Pedro> support to gdb. Working on instructure still (I can run all-stop on
> Pedro> top of a target running in non-stop mode now), and the final syntax
> Pedro> will obviously need discussion, but I think we could come up with
> Pedro> syntax for this within that framework.
>
> I think it would be good to flesh out the syntax details now.
> Maybe you could post your proposal; or even just a link to the earlier
> proposal if you plan to follow it.
Will do, either I or Stan. I've been focused on target async and
infrustructure leg work, so haven't really thought much on syntax. I
think the main options to discuss will be prefix syntax, or new options
to execution commands syntax. Hopefuly this week or the next I'll have
enough glue to go through this and experiment a bit.
> It would be helpful to the ambiguous linespec work if the basic ptset
> code (stuff relating to the data structure itself, not wiring it into
> inferior control) were available "early" -- I'm away for a bit, and I
> don't know your schedule, so it all may be fine; but I mean sometime in
> October.
Hopefuly sooner.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-30 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-30 1:49 Doug Evans
2011-08-30 9:16 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-30 10:01 ` pfee
2011-08-30 11:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-30 12:42 ` pfee
2011-08-30 14:21 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-08-30 15:09 ` Doug Evans
2011-08-30 15:22 ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-30 17:13 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-30 17:29 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-09-02 16:48 ` Doug Evans
2011-08-30 17:00 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108301829.03121.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=pfee@talk21.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox