From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26165 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2011 09:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 26156 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2011 09:16:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:16:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7U9GSAa009972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 05:16:28 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-38.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.38]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7U9GPT0012485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 05:16:27 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7U9GOpL005799; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:16:24 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7U9GNma005798; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:16:23 +0200 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:16:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet Message-ID: <20110830091623.GA5329@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110830014851.78030246131@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110830014851.78030246131@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00587.txt.bz2 On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 03:48:51 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: > Sometimes I want to run with scheduler-locking on, but having to turn it on, > perform the command, and remember to turn it off afterwards is annoying. Please no, Fedora already has default `set scheduler-locking step' because this is what the users expect from the stepping commands. What are the reasons for not using `set scheduler-locking step'? IIRC there was some (ppc only?) regression which is this patch for: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gdb.git;a=blob_plain;f=gdb-6.6-scheduler_locking-step-sw-watchpoints2.patch;hb=f16 Thanks, Jan