From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13175 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2011 19:21:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 13166 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Aug 2011 19:21:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:21:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7TJLHXM016629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:21:17 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-38.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.38]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7TJLFqJ001244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:21:17 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7TJLEIV004546; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:21:14 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7TJLCjp004541; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:21:12 +0200 Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:21:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFDDtm5pdHo=?= Cc: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] 12843 Message-ID: <20110829192112.GA29862@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <4E56C5A0.60802@redhat.com> <201108290920.40589.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <201108291112.53906.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201108291417.02082.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201108291417.02082.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00577.txt.bz2 On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:17:02 +0200, André Pönitz wrote: > I am really interested in the IDE case which I believe to be one intented > use case for the MI protocol, and would like to ask to consider choosing > a robust protocol that makes general automated interaction with gdb simple. When you are already considering changes on the front end side has been discussed some replacement by D-Bus, ORBit2 or similar RPC protocol? It would make all the parsing and escaping not any issue. I spend these days on some entryval extensions of MI protocol so I have these ideas. Thanks, Jan