From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24740 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2011 17:17:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 24724 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2011 17:17:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:17:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7KHHX5i004114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:17:33 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-42.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.42]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7KHHVYO027502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:17:32 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7KHHUqV000971; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:17:30 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7KHHS5l000968; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:17:28 +0200 Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:17:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Sanjoy Das , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Introduce header (jit-reader.h.in) and modify build system. Message-ID: <20110820171728.GA26447@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <1312903509-25132-1-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <1312903509-25132-2-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <83fwlazja8.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83fwlazja8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00394.txt.bz2 On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:39:11 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I understand that jit.c will be compiled unconditionally on the x86 > architectures, is that right? If so, would it be possible to rename > jit-header.h.in to jit-header.in, or some other name that doesn't > violate the file-naming restrictions on 8+3 (a.k.a. DOS) filesystems? Do you have some recent successful build of DJGPP on such 8+3 platform? jit-header.h.in is the only right name to substitute for jit-header.h so it would make sense to break the naming for some real portability. But the last statement from you Re: [RFC] DJGPP: fnchange.lst removal attempt http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00389.html said the last build you done was gdb-7.0 and I was not successful myself on FreeDOS in that mail thread. Thanks, Jan