From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10340 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2011 21:42:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 10332 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Aug 2011 21:42:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:41:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p78LfwRH026626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:41:58 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p78LftVV000445 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:41:57 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p78Lfs38023396; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 23:41:54 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p78LfsUM023395; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 23:41:54 +0200 Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:42:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix DW_OP_stack_value for big endian Message-ID: <20110808214154.GA22079@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110805210437.GA26918@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:22:56 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > Anyway, this patch is fine by me. I also find the patch mostly obvious, therefore checked in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-08/msg00044.html Thanks, Jan