From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8239 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2011 16:01:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 8231 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2011 16:01:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:01:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6TG1McX032623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:01:22 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-20.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.20]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6TG1JsN009546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:01:21 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6TG1J3n016453; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:01:19 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6TG1J6L016452; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:01:19 +0200 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:17:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC 11/12] entryval: "@entry" in input expressions Message-ID: <20110729160118.GA15923@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110718202410.GL30496@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00810.txt.bz2 On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:55:11 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > +If you append @code{@@entry} string to a function parameter name you get its > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > This should be @kbd{@@entry}, since it's something the user should > type at the keyboard. done. > Suggest not to talk about GCC explicitly, but about something more > vague, like "only with some compilers". done. > You yourself said in this > thread that Ubuntu back-ported the patch to GCC 4.6.x, Fedora > so saying "since 4.7" would be misleading. There should be "FSF GCC" statement. It is sometimes good to give a picture if it was in gcc-2.95 or in gcc-4.7. But gcc-4.7 should be in Fedoras soon again so I do not find it such a concern. It will be in a new patchset resubmit. Thanks, Jan