From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30743 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2011 15:54:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 30735 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2011 15:54:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:54:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7788A2BB3F3; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:54:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AwyJJQ0amiSj; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:54:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315562BB3F2; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:54:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 23CF4145615; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:01:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: pfee@talk21.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Enhancement - show old and new thread info when switching during debugging Message-ID: <20110729155438.GH5177@adacore.com> References: <1311947955.89527.YahooMailRC@web86708.mail.ird.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1311947955.89527.YahooMailRC@web86708.mail.ird.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00808.txt.bz2 > The following patch is also attached to bug 13042. > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13042 > > It gives the user info about the thread they're switching from in > addition to that which they're switching to. This is useful if the > switch was not intended and they wish to continue debugging the old > thread. Isn't that information already present in the previous "[Switching to thread ...]" message? -- Joel