From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82688-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21352 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2011 19:57:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 21344 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2011 19:57:44 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:57:29 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6RJtwBO005289;	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:55:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p6RJttWS016829;	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:55:56 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 05:19:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201107271955.p6RJttWS016829@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: tromey@redhat.com
CC: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, drow@false.org,        hjl@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <m34o278rth.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (message from Tom Tromey on	Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:08:26 -0600)
Subject: Re: RFC: partially available registers
References: <m3vcv6xegp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<201107222010.23822.pedro@codesourcery.com>	<m3mxg6w1si.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<201107261631.18672.pedro@codesourcery.com>	<m3d3gv8vuj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m34o278rth.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00783.txt.bz2

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:08:26 -0600
> 
> Pedro> ... but I think that we should go with 0, instead of <unavailable>,
> Pedro> meaning changing x87-tdep.c:i387_supply_xsave to supply
> Pedro> explicity zeroed buffer, instead of a NULL pointer, like
> Pedro> gdbserver does.
> 
> Tom> I will do this.
> 
> Here's the patch.
> 
> In absence of comment I will check it in, in a couple of days.

Please hold off for a moment.