From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1303 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2011 17:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 1291 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2011 17:08:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:08:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6RH8Agt029530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:08:11 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-20.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.20]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6RH88wj004161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:08:10 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6RH87mM031937; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:08:07 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6RH87kD031933; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:08:07 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:14:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Reshuffle code for patch 2/2 Message-ID: <20110727170807.GA28885@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110727153004.GA9736@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00771.txt.bz2 On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:23:37 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > Thanks. I'm happy to see that these aren't internal_errors any more, as > well. Checked in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-07/msg00225.html Thanks, Jan