From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23773 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2011 13:26:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 23754 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2011 13:26:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:25:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 7007 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2011 13:25:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 22 Jul 2011 13:25:50 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: partially available registers Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Tom Tromey , Daniel Jacobowitz References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107221425.46930.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00608.txt.bz2 Hi Tom, On Wednesday 20 July 2011 21:14:08, Tom Tromey wrote: > 2011-07-20 Tom Tromey > > * gdb.dwarf2/typeddwarf.c: XFAIL 'z' on x86-64. > * gdb.dwarf2/typeddwarf.exp (xfail-gdb-test): Add arch_pattern > argument. > * gdb.dwarf2/typeddwarf-amd64.S: New file. I get: # of expected passes 39 with an unpatched gdb (x86-64-linux), same as with patched gdb. Is that expected? -- Pedro Alves