From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17546 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2011 18:49:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 17537 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2011 18:49:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:49:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 14748 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2011 18:49:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 20 Jul 2011 18:49:10 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: partially available registers Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:14:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Tom Tromey References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107201949.07580.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2 On Sunday 17 July 2011 21:26:17, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > > > Daniel> As for the patch itself: > > Daniel> * Some documentation on the gdbarch method would be nice, in > > Daniel> particular, the return value. Does 0 mean "not a pseudo"? > > > > Yeah, I left that out for the initial change, but I think I shouldn't > > have. > > > > I find gdbarch.sh very hard to read. Does anybody else? > > Incredibly. Someone please flip us to C++ and use a normal construct > for this... Hey, gcc flipped this week. We're running behind already. :-) -- Pedro Alves