From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31700 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2011 20:26:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 31690 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2011 20:26:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:25:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JKPuXG022615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:25:56 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-20.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.20]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JKPs6F019960; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:25:55 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JKPs8n030629; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:25:54 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6JKPr5e030628; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:25:53 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:29:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix implicit pointer vs. typedefs Message-ID: <20110719202553.GA24651@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110718150124.GA24706@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00495.txt.bz2 On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:33:17 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > Thanks Jan. It looks good to me. Checked in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-07/msg00165.html > I have come around to your view that we should get rid of check_typedef. For that (VLA) plan I think it would be useful to base it already on C++. Thanks, Jan