From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28695 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2011 18:13:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 28687 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2011 18:13:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:13:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JIDEeB004378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:13:14 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-20.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.20]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JIDDRU018443; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:13:13 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6JIDCx0019253; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:13:12 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6JIDBre019250; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:13:11 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:27:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 00/12] entryval: Fix x86_64 parameters, virtual tail call frames Message-ID: <20110719181311.GA16667@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110718201344.GA30496@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110719163728.GA10909@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2 On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:52:25 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > AX needs some big upgrades, or maybe an "AX 2.0" explicitly based on > DWARF. OK, thanks for the info. > A related problem closer to home is that watchpoints don't respect > location lists. I at least filed it some time ago. hardware watchpoint missed for -O2 -g inferior http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11613 Jan