From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82369-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3968 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2011 13:48:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 3951 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2011 13:48:15 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:48:01 +0000
Received: (qmail 13745 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2011 13:48:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2)  by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 19 Jul 2011 13:48:01 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:19:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, iam ahal <hal9000ed2k@gmail.com>, pmuldoon@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com
References: <BANLkTinD+9_Mkug8o2VhZ03L6XSriL_RKQ@mail.gmail.com> <E1Qdhn8-0000fE-TK@fencepost.gnu.org> <20110704205101.GU2407@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110704205101.GU2407@adacore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201107191447.58383.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00464.txt.bz2

On Monday 04 July 2011 21:51:01, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: iam ahal <hal9000ed2k@gmail.com>
> > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > > > But a larger concern is that GNU coding standards frown on using
> > > > "path" when you really mean "file name".  So I think we should rename
> > > > the option "basename" and the documentation should say
> > >
> > > What's about backtrace's argument name "nopath"?
> > 
> > I stated my suggestion.  I'll let Joel and others decide whether it is
> > mandatory to change to "basename" or somesuch.
> 
> FWIW, I think "basename" is better than "nopath".

Another +1.

-- 
Pedro Alves