From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8371 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2011 22:50:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 8348 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2011 22:50:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_LV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:50:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACFF2BB4B7; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5cMbbfjwLaW9; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD942BB4B5; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3701145615; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:52:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yuri , Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [patch,7.3] Fix JIT clang-lli gdb-7.3 regression Re: [gdb-7.3] Error in gdb-llvm integration: Unable to read JIT descriptor from remote memory! Message-ID: <20110706225032.GH2407@adacore.com> References: <4E0FAB8D.2070709@rawbw.com> <20110704214654.GA21844@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110705170728.GY2407@adacore.com> <20110706220611.GF2407@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 > This then leaves the "unload/reload" case not handled. > > I will extend the test case to show this failure, and then fix it (HEAD > only, as that is not a very important use case). Great! That was my understanding too. Thanks, Paul. -- Joel