From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82087-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18068 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2011 02:38:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 18060 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2011 02:38:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 02:38:18 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p662cELX008730;	Wed, 6 Jul 2011 04:38:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p662cDaG005037;	Wed, 6 Jul 2011 04:38:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 02:46:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201107060238.p662cDaG005037@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to:	<CAMiUf7eeqjufkCmmLiZVYG_b7yb15j0D6BLkWbc83C3atszT4Q@mail.gmail.com>	(message from Sanjoy Das on Wed, 6 Jul 2011 08:01:34 +0530)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Activate JIT code unwinder for i386.
References: <1309847489-13760-1-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <1309847489-13760-4-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <201107051524.p65FO8pL010651@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <CAMiUf7eeqjufkCmmLiZVYG_b7yb15j0D6BLkWbc83C3atszT4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2

> From: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com>
> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 08:01:34 +0530
> 
> > What's your motivation for putting the JIT unwinder at that spot in
> > the list of unwinders?  I'd put it behind the DWARF CFI unwinders
> > since those are the ones that most people will hit.
> >
> 
> I'll fix that before the next iteration.

Well, if you have a good reason to prepend it, that's ok.  But if not,
then yes, I think it's the way to go.