From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30357 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2011 07:53:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 30346 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jul 2011 07:53:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:53:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p657r73u010787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 03:53:07 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-113-84.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.84]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p657r5QW030176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 03:53:07 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p657r5Fs002808; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 09:53:05 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p657r3hf002803; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 09:53:03 +0200 Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:00:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yuri Subject: Re: [patch,7.3] Fix JIT clang-lli gdb-7.3 regression Message-ID: <20110705075303.GA2559@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <4E0FAB8D.2070709@rawbw.com> <20110704214654.GA21844@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00138.txt.bz2 On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:20:08 +0200, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > Certainly using a single global to guard against recursive invocation can > not possibly work correctly in multi-inferior GDB. I was coding it into inf_data first but then changed it as I do not see how it could harm as a single global. But I am not much multi-inferior experienced so I could miss something. > we should keep the jit_inferior_data per-objfile, and not > per-inferior. This might even allow GDB to work with multiple JITers > in the same inferior ;-) That's true and fine for 7.4 but that is an extension and not a 7.3 late release cycle regression/blocker. Thanks, Jan