From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28503 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2011 20:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 28491 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jul 2011 20:51:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 20:51:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBA02BB226; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:51:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tOPQzC2F6e6m; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:51:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D907B2BB225; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:51:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9BA1D145615; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 13:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 21:47:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: iam ahal , pmuldoon@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename) Message-ID: <20110704205101.GU2407@adacore.com> References: <20110627160029.GF20676@adacore.com> <834o33qlm9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2 > > What's about backtrace's argument name "nopath"? > > I stated my suggestion. I'll let Joel and others decide whether it is > mandatory to change to "basename" or somesuch. FWIW, I think "basename" is better than "nopath". However, I'm more concerned about the fact that this is implemented as an option of the backtrace argument rather than as a setting. Those of us who have expressed an opinion seem to clearly favor the user of a setting. Now, to find an appropriate name for that setting... -- Joel