From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13758 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2011 08:59:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 13750 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2011 08:59:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:58:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 407 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2011 08:58:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 30 Jun 2011 08:58:54 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gdb: tests: set remotetimeout to gdb_load_timeout for remote targets Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:59:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Joel Brobecker , Mike Frysinger , toolchain-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, Jie Zhang References: <1307309678-10966-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1308510312-5512-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20110629162527.GC2407@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20110629162527.GC2407@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106300958.52442.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 29 June 2011 17:25:27, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > + send_gdb "show remotetimeout\n" > > + gdb_expect { > > Can you use gdb_test_multiple instead? UUIC, that would add something like "PASS: show remotetimeout" to every test. Is that wanted? I was under the impression that was the reason we didn't use gdb_test_multiple for infrustructure setup within gdb.exp. -- Pedro Alves