From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [patch 1/2] Code reformatting for patch 2/2 [Re: Regression: Re: [PATCH] Fix some i386 unwinder inconcistencies]
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110626084110.GA28242@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110613104911.GA1965@host1.jankratochvil.net>
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:49:11 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On all the tested platforms Fedora-{13,14,15,Rawhide} for {i686,x86_64-m32}
> (but not for x86_64):
> -PASS: gdb.base/watchpoint-cond-gone.exp: Catch the no longer valid watchpoint
> +FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoint-cond-gone.exp: Catch the no longer valid watchpoint
> -XFAIL: gdb.mi/mi-watch.exp: sw: watchpoint trigger (stopped at wrong place)
> +XFAIL: gdb.mi/mi-watch.exp: sw: watchpoint trigger (unknown output after running)
> -XFAIL: gdb.mi/mi2-watch.exp: sw: watchpoint trigger (stopped at wrong place)
> +XFAIL: gdb.mi/mi2-watch.exp: sw: watchpoint trigger (unknown output after running)
Nothing interesting in this part, no functionality change intended.
Thanks,
Jan
gdb/
2011-06-26 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Code cleanup - reformatting.
* dwarf2read.c (producer_is_gcc_ge_4_0): Rename to ...
(producer_is_gcc_ge_4): ... here, change the return value.
(process_full_comp_unit): New variable gcc_4_minor, adjust the value
interpretation.
--- a/gdb/dwarf2read.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2read.c
@@ -4646,10 +4646,12 @@ compute_delayed_physnames (struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
}
}
-/* Check for GCC >= 4.0. */
+/* Check for GCC >= 4.x. Return minor version (x) of 4.x in such case. If it
+ is not GCC or it is GCC older than 4.x return -1. If it is GCC 5.x or
+ higher return INT_MAX. */
static int
-producer_is_gcc_ge_4_0 (struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
+producer_is_gcc_ge_4 (struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
{
const char *cs;
int major, minor;
@@ -4660,7 +4662,7 @@ producer_is_gcc_ge_4_0 (struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
this case can also happen for -gdwarf-4 type units supported since
gcc-4.5. */
- return 0;
+ return -1;
}
/* Skip any identifier after "GNU " - such as "C++" or "Java". */
@@ -4669,7 +4671,7 @@ producer_is_gcc_ge_4_0 (struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
{
/* For non-GCC compilers expect their behavior is not compliant. */
- return 0;
+ return -1;
}
cs = &cu->producer[strlen ("GNU ")];
while (*cs && !isdigit (*cs))
@@ -4678,10 +4680,14 @@ producer_is_gcc_ge_4_0 (struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
{
/* Not recognized as GCC. */
- return 0;
+ return -1;
}
- return major >= 4;
+ if (major < 4)
+ return -1;
+ if (major > 4)
+ return INT_MAX;
+ return minor;
}
/* Generate full symbol information for PST and CU, whose DIEs have
@@ -4725,6 +4731,8 @@ process_full_comp_unit (struct dwarf2_per_cu_data *per_cu)
if (symtab != NULL)
{
+ int gcc_4_minor = producer_is_gcc_ge_4 (cu);
+
/* Set symtab language to language from DW_AT_language. If the
compilation is from a C file generated by language preprocessors, do
not set the language if it was already deduced by start_subfile. */
@@ -4741,7 +4749,7 @@ process_full_comp_unit (struct dwarf2_per_cu_data *per_cu)
Still one can confuse GDB by using non-standard GCC compilation
options - this waits on GCC PR other/32998 (-frecord-gcc-switches).
*/
- if (cu->has_loclist && producer_is_gcc_ge_4_0 (cu))
+ if (cu->has_loclist && gcc_4_minor >= 0)
symtab->locations_valid = 1;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-26 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-12 20:57 [PATCH] Fix some i386 unwinder inconcistencies Mark Kettenis
2011-06-13 2:32 ` Yao Qi
2011-06-13 14:50 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-06-13 10:49 ` Regression: " Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-13 15:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-06-13 16:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-13 19:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-06-13 20:46 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-26 8:41 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-06-29 22:20 ` [patch 1/2] Code reformatting for patch 2/2 [Re: Regression: Re: [PATCH] Fix some i386 unwinder inconcistencies] Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-26 8:42 ` [patch 2/2] Disable epilogue unwinders on recent GCCs " Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-27 9:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2011-06-28 20:02 ` Tom Tromey
2011-06-28 20:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-29 22:26 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-06-28 19:56 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110626084110.GA28242@host1.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox