From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21507 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2011 15:04:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 21499 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2011 15:04:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:04:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p58F4MV6015926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:04:22 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-113-49.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.49]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p58F4JH3026621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:04:21 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p58F4Itb011903; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:04:19 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p58F4H8Z011900; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:04:17 +0200 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:04:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] physname reg.: linespec minsym fallback Message-ID: <20110608150417.GA4644@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110605202645.GB20427@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:30:24 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > This looks like it will conflict with one of Keith's patches, which > touches the same code. It does not, it merges cleanly. I was touching code outside of decode_compound while Keith the code of decode_compound. (There is a very simple conflict with my patch "Follow DW_AT_linkage_name for methods" but I do not think it is worth of any talk about it.) Thanks, Jan