From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7950 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2011 17:24:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 7937 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2011 17:24:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_QI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:23:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p55HNiZu010475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 5 Jun 2011 13:23:44 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-113-49.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.49]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p55HNgFp011395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 5 Jun 2011 13:23:44 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p55HNfaQ015157; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 19:23:41 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p55HNeMO015151; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 19:23:40 +0200 Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:24:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: comments formatting [Re: [patch] physname regression: Non-matching type false breakpoint] Message-ID: <20110605172340.GA14424@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110605153419.GA14873@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201106051557.p55FvVIu022894@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20110605161907.GA28751@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110605163506.GA1273@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110605165659.GA6565@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 19:15:32 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > OK (in VIM it is gq} or gqip ). I use 79 columns instead of 70. > So in the case of 70 columns what would be the right formatting of: > > /* The strchr check is there if any types were specified verify the single found found parameter types really match those specified by user in COPY. */ This is not a quote of my text, I wrote: /* The strchr check is there if any verify the single found found parameter foo types really match those specified by user in COPY. */ See: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00074.html > It would be the one I produced in the previous email: The text I provided was specially crafted to hit the same problem with 70 columns as I faced with the 79 columns and as I / others will face in the future. When the GNU Coding Standard does describe the comments formatting rules one has to unfortunately reverse engineer them from Emacs. Thanks, Jan