From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11606 invoked by alias); 26 May 2011 14:16:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 11597 invoked by uid 22791); 26 May 2011 14:16:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:16:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 2884 invoked from network); 26 May 2011 14:16:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 26 May 2011 14:16:05 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: $zero on alpha should always be available Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:16:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-8-generic; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis References: <201105211919.p4LJJn5Z013541@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <201105241216.07135.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110525205139.GA2588@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20110525205139.GA2588@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105261516.02661.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00599.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 25 May 2011 21:51:39, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > > Thanks Joel. Even if you can't run any testsuite, > > confirming that nothing broke in an obvious way, and > > that $zero appears as 0 to 'p $zero' or "info all-registers", > > and not as with a running program would be a good > > test already. The alpha-nat.c change is trying to make > > the same fix for loading alpha-OSF cores. > > It turned out to be a little more effort than usual to test the change, > because we no longer do builds on Tru64, and one of the machines > I used to use broke down. Sorry about the extra work. > That being said, I was able to test the debugger, both with AdaCore's > testsuite as well as the manual testing that suggested, and it all > works marvelously :-). > > Thanks for taking care of that... Thanks! I've applied it to mainline and 7.3 (given it was a regression). -- Pedro Alves