From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19389 invoked by alias); 24 May 2011 09:00:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 19381 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2011 09:00:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:00:42 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4O8xKhc012584; Tue, 24 May 2011 10:59:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p4O8xH7Q019617; Tue, 24 May 2011 10:59:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:00:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201105240859.p4O8xH7Q019617@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: yao@codesourcery.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <4DDB0DC6.9050200@codesourcery.com> (message from Yao Qi on Tue, 24 May 2011 09:45:42 +0800) Subject: Re: [_Complex test 4/4 V3] _Complex tests in callfuncs.exp References: <4DC401D0.1050500@codesourcery.com> <4DC75036.4040806@codesourcery.com> <4DD4A5DC.9060004@codesourcery.com> <4DD6238D.40501@codesourcery.com> <4DDB0DC6.9050200@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00553.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:45:42 +0800 > From: Yao Qi > > This is the version 3 of patch 4/4. In this version, > setup_kfail_for_target is used to KFAIL the same fail to different PRs > according to target triplet, same as what I did in patch 3/4. Can't you fold this behaviour into the normal setup_kfail?