From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10453 invoked by alias); 22 May 2011 18:24:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 10444 invoked by uid 22791); 22 May 2011 18:24:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 18:23:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4MINjJG025629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 22 May 2011 14:23:45 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-113-23.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.23]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4MINg8L025187 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 May 2011 14:23:44 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4MINfv7030192; Sun, 22 May 2011 20:23:41 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4MINc11030187; Sun, 22 May 2011 20:23:38 +0200 Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 18:24:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: fix `gdb -write' case Message-ID: <20110522182338.GA24020@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <4DC75B31.2020501@codesourcery.com> <20110511143828.GA28962@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 On Wed, 11 May 2011 21:41:47 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > What do you think of this? It uses the expected type to construct the > array's values when it makes sense. OK, I like it now. Thanks, Jan