Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [RFC] canonical linespec and multiple breakpoints ...
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 16:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110505162855.GA2546@adacore.com> (raw)

Hello,

Re: [PATCH 2/6] Introduce `pre_expanded sals'
    http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-04/msg00038.html
    http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-05/msg00074.html

Jerome and I were discussing a way to move foward without having
to design everything, as the week is rapidly getting to a close.
(Jerome heads back to Paris at the end of this week, and will
be back to his normal schedule, so we're trying to take advantage
of his presence his as much as we can).

If we agree that a breakpoint expression (linespec) that gets resolved
into multiple source locations (slocs) should result in one breakpoint
per sloc, then we can start working on that.

The above requires that we agree on a way to make sure that each
breakpoint carries enough information to re-set itself, which means
that the information should make the breakpoint unique. We've handled
that issue by using a canonical linespec (FILE:FUNCTION:LINE), and
it has worked well for us.

I think that implementing the above in a way that allows each language
to implement their own way of dealing with templates/generics/homonyms
should be reasonably easy, and we'd still be much farther ahead than
we are now. What Jerome and I propose is that we implement the
infrastructure to make it work for C, and possibly Ada (we'll probably
wait for the Ada bits until the infrastructure is approved). We would
rather let the C++ bits to someone else, as we still have limited
experience with C++ itself.

We think that this will handle most situations, except the situation
where new symbols cause extra slocs to appear (typically, a shared
library gets mapped in memory). We are planing on plugging that hole
as a followup, which can be made independently, for instance using
Pedro's idea of introducing an extra level of breakpoint. The exact
details on how this is going to be done need to be discussed, but,
in the meantime, our experience with Ada show that the approach
we are proposing as a first step has been working well for our users.

Thoughts?

Thanks,
-- 
Joel


             reply	other threads:[~2011-05-05 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-05 16:29 Joel Brobecker [this message]
2011-05-05 20:50 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-05 22:40   ` Joel Brobecker
2011-05-06  3:20     ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-06  4:42       ` Joel Brobecker
2011-05-06 18:08         ` Matt Rice
2011-05-06  7:16     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-06 19:18     ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-06  7:10   ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-05-26 21:06     ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-27  7:56       ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-06-30 21:35         ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-01 18:06           ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-02  6:35             ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-05 19:52               ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-05 21:07                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-05 21:46                   ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-04 19:32             ` Joel Brobecker
2011-07-05  9:20               ` Jerome Guitton
2011-07-05 15:24                 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-07-05 19:53               ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-26 21:06             ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-27 15:10               ` Matt Rice
2011-07-27 16:23               ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-28 15:18               ` Matt Rice
2011-08-02 15:33               ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-02 17:09                 ` Tom Tromey
2011-08-02 18:00                   ` Pedro Alves
2011-11-18 19:31                     ` Tom Tromey
2012-02-16 23:31                       ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-02  6:15           ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-05 20:00             ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-27 10:50       ` Matt Rice
2011-05-29 13:01       ` Matt Rice
2011-07-05 20:01         ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-06  2:32           ` Matt Rice
2011-09-18 13:47 Avi Gozlan
2011-10-03 16:28 ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110505162855.GA2546@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox