From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-80789-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7418 invoked by alias); 4 May 2011 17:10:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 7408 invoked by uid 22791); 4 May 2011 17:09:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:09:42 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p44H9eF0023639	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 4 May 2011 13:09:40 -0400
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p44H9cG6029627	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Wed, 4 May 2011 13:09:39 -0400
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p44H9bIV003901;	Wed, 4 May 2011 19:09:37 +0200
Received: (from jkratoch@localhost)	by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p44H9bjx003896;	Wed, 4 May 2011 19:09:37 +0200
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 17:10:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Is physname mangled or not?  (PR c++/8216)
Message-ID: <20110504170936.GA3846@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <201105031858.p43IwneJ006235@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20110504150846.GA27179@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110504165903.GA26809@caradoc.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110504165903.GA26809@caradoc.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2

On Wed, 04 May 2011 18:59:08 +0200, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> No.  The constructor is named C, not C<int>, I believe.

I agree now:

0000000000400506 W C<int>::C()
0000000000400506 W _ZN1CIiEC1Ev


Thanks,
Jan