From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29024 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2011 11:49:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 29014 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2011 11:49:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:49:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C1C2BB29A; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:49:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aVCpdOtt9vo4; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:49:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9DE2BABC4; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:48:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 824E91459B0; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:49:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch][branch] Fix "save breakpoints" for watchpoints Message-ID: <20110414114856.GD11452@adacore.com> References: <1302295317.2074.9.camel@hactar> <201104121204.34544.pedro@codesourcery.com> <1302719616.3459.3.camel@hactar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1302719616.3459.3.camel@hactar> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2 > On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 12:04 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > On Friday 08 April 2011 21:41:56, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > > > No regressions on i386-linux. Ok for HEAD and the branch? > > > > Okay, thanks. > > Thanks for the review. Committed to HEAD. I assume I should wait for > Joel's OK for the branch? Global Maintainers who reviewed the patch are also able to approve pushes to the branch, as I think they often know more about the patch than I do. However, I looked at this one, and it looks fine for the branch :). -- Joel