From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16731 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2011 19:22:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 16722 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2011 19:22:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_OC,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate4.uk.ibm.com (HELO mtagate4.uk.ibm.com) (194.196.100.164) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:22:50 +0000 Received: from d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.233]) by mtagate4.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p35JMgbQ025007 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 19:22:42 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p35JNOHS1659114 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:23:24 +0100 Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p35JMgiP006163 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:22:42 -0600 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id p35JMeFA006141; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:22:40 -0600 Message-Id: <201104051922.p35JMeFA006141@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:22:40 +0200 Subject: Re: [rfc v2][rft (procfs, nto-procfs)] Fix signal bypass heuristic with software single-step To: pedro@codesourcery.com (Pedro Alves), brobecker@adacore.com, aristovski@qnx.com Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:22:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <201104041047.44630.pedro@codesourcery.com> from "Pedro Alves" at Apr 04, 2011 10:47:44 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Thursday 31 March 2011 20:11:49, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > Thoughts? > > This makes sense to me. Thanks for thinking this through. > > The patch looked okay to me. Thanks for your review and comments! I'd prefer if there were some way to test this on a profcs and a nto-procfs target before applying the patch, though ... Joel, I was wondering if you still have some procfs-based machines (e.g. Solaris) where you could run a test? Aleksandar, would it be possible for you to test the patch on a NTO machine? The patch in question is here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-03/msg01223.html Thanks for your help! Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com