Re: [rfc v2][rft (procfs, nto-procfs)] Fix signal bypass heuristic with software single-step

Pedro Alves
2011-04-04T09:47:52Z

On Thursday 31 March 2011 20:11:49, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> > Might be we just need to check if _any_ thread is stepping, when
> > deciding whether to tell the target to report back all signals?
>
> I've thought about this a bit more. The primary cause why we need
> to tell the target to report back all signals is because we have
> pulled out breakpoints to step over one -- this is why running
> arbitrary signal handlers would be dangerous.

...

> Thoughts?

This makes sense to me. Thanks for thinking this through.

The patch looked okay to me.

--
Pedro Alves