Re: [rfc v2][rft (procfs, nto-procfs)] Fix signal bypass heuristic with software single-step

Ulrich Weigand
2011-04-26T17:34:58Z

Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:

> I tested your patch on self-hosted x86 Neutrino and it did not show any
> regressions.

Great! Thanks for your support.

> BTW, can you incorporate this in your patch to remove compile issues:
>
> @@ -72,9 +72,11 @@ static ptid_t do_attach (ptid_t ptid);
>
> static int procfs_can_use_hw_breakpoint (int, int, int);
>
> -static int procfs_insert_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type);
> +static int procfs_insert_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type,
> + struct expression *);
>
> -static int procfs_remove_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type);
> +static int procfs_remove_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type,
> + struct expression *);
>
> static int procfs_stopped_by_watchpoint (void);

Sure; I've checked this part in right away.

Thanks,