From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-79858-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28358 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2011 20:10:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 28315 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2011 20:10:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:10:10 +0000
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2LKA8d4025033	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:10:08 -0400
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2LKA6Gq001516	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:10:08 -0400
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2LKA6lo001215;	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:10:06 +0100
Received: (from jkratoch@localhost)	by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2LKA58P001214;	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:10:05 +0100
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:15:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] DWARF-3+ DW_AT_accessibility defaults #2 (GCC PR debug/45124)
Message-ID: <20110321201005.GA922@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20110321154428.GA3761@host1.jankratochvil.net> <m3d3lkv2i0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3d3lkv2i0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00971.txt.bz2

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:53:43 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I think this is ok.

Checked in:
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-03/msg00258.html


> I am not really a fan of producer checks, but I couldn't think of
> anything better.

I was curious I haven't found any GCC/G++ DW_AT_producer check so far.


Thanks,
Jan