From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2882 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2011 23:20:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 2865 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2011 23:20:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:20:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984DD2BB091; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:20:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aZks51EoHom3; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:20:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADD52BB095; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:20:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF8681459B0; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 03:20:46 +0400 (RET) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 03:19:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Keith Seitz Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Re: [RFA] c++/11734 revisited (and c++/12273) Message-ID: <20110316232046.GV31264@adacore.com> References: <20110227211637.GA18378@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4D6D6C74.8080304@redhat.com> <20110313222824.GA24322@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4D7FB469.9080703@redhat.com> <20110316065928.GA3316@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4D8130B1.6070505@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D8130B1.6070505@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00884.txt.bz2 > >So asking for this change if I haven't missed anything and a check-in. > > I've changed this, updated the ChangeLog, added a > "remove_trailing_whitespace" function to cli/cli-utils.c as Tom > suggested, and checked this all in. Does it mean that we should be good to go for the 7.2.1 release soon? I don't think that the patches have been checked in the 7.2 branch, but these PRs have been identified as critical for the .1 release. It seems that finding these fixes have been a bit long and treacherous, so we may want to think twice about putting it in 7.2 (?); or wait a certain amount of time to observer the change in HEAD before porting to the branch... -- Joel