From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23799 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2011 18:11:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 23790 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2011 18:11:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:11:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519E12BB090; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:11:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rceowJdp6bsw; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:11:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F4A2BB01B; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:11:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EE791459B0; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:10:58 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:24:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Remove new lines at end of messages Message-ID: <20110316181058.GT31264@adacore.com> References: <000001cbe401$85270be0$8f7523a0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20110316175218.GS31264@adacore.com> <000301cbe404$0f0ca480$2d25ed80$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000301cbe404$0f0ca480$2d25ed80$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00869.txt.bz2 > It was mainly to announce the ARI web page change that > I didn't use the obvious rule... Just to avoid confusions, I will NEVER EVER blame anyone for requesting review. It's usually pretty straightforward to review patches that are considered obvious, so it's always OK to ask for review. -- Joel