From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32268 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2011 13:46:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 32258 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2011 13:46:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:46:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2EDkKxI016906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:46:20 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2EDkIA0029077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:46:20 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2EDkI6o005006; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:46:18 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2EDkHUj005003; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:46:17 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:53:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tristan Gingold Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA] make first parameter of to_lookup_symbol const char * Message-ID: <20110314134616.GA2680@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <58CFFAD9-1C02-4AD8-B416-FC48D1A7F006@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58CFFAD9-1C02-4AD8-B416-FC48D1A7F006@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00724.txt.bz2 Hi Tristan., On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:13:43 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote: > is there any good reason why the NAME parameter is 'char *' instead of > 'const char *' ? I can't see any of them. there were many similar patches. > BTW, it looks like no target defines this operation... Unless you use it for some new patch of yours it should be removed instead. Thanks, Jan