From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16574 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2011 20:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 16566 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2011 20:01:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:01:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 30224 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 20:01:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 8 Mar 2011 20:01:37 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: lazily call save_current_space_and_thread Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-27-generic; KDE/4.6.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Tom Tromey , Jan Kratochvil References: <201103081802.35770.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103082001.36172.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 08 March 2011 19:54:31, Tom Tromey wrote: > Also, this code will still do the right thing if there actually is a > selected frame. Yeah, no question. I was just wondering whether in non-stop this particular optimization would be enough or if we had to do something else at a higher layer, but it turns out it is. Thanks, BTW. -- Pedro Alves