From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14307 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2011 09:43:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 14297 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2011 09:43:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:43:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p289gp0K019829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 04:42:51 -0500 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p289gnTd009850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 04:42:51 -0500 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p289gnAb003203; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:42:49 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p289gm6e003198; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:42:48 +0100 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:02:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: quick status on gdb-7.2.1 & gdb-7.3? (Mar 07) Message-ID: <20110308094248.GA3159@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110307122732.GC2478@adacore.com> <20110308051315.GM30306@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110308051315.GM30306@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00522.txt.bz2 On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:13:15 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I think ifunc is more important. Without ifunc, a very common idiom > > will not work on recent glibc-based systems: > > > > cond 5 !strcmp(arg, "whatever") > > OK - I have moved this task to the non-optional part of the TODO > list for GDB 7.3. Do we have a rough estimate on how soon we might > be able to merge this code? It works without bugs but various cases are suboptimal there but I do not remember which ones. Working on it today as I was just procrastinating the linespec review anyway. Jan