From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17415 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 12:14:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 17404 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 12:13:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_WW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:13:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC392BAF8A; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 07:13:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id N5xDeI8rdapL; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 07:13:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBF42BAE2B; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 07:13:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EF6B1459AD; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 16:13:31 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:35:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: time to start thinking about GDB 7.3 (as well!) Message-ID: <20110307121331.GG30306@adacore.com> References: <20110214145010.GX2384@adacore.com> <201102141514.26090.vapier@gentoo.org> <201103071130.06889.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103071130.06889.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00455.txt.bz2 > Let me put some stuff there then. :-) > > Joel, do I still have time to get my second and third parts > of the values support (posted the other week) into 7.3? > > > > > WDYT? This makes the tracing experience much better compared to 7.2. I think you do. The progress I'm seeing on the real blocker seems to be vewwwy vewwwy slow :-(. -- Joel