From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26823 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 09:50:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 26813 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 09:50:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:50:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB032BAF72; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 04:50:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NIeQj0Qu0X8M; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 04:50:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511242BAF71; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 04:50:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA9A91459AD; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:50:03 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:00:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yao Qi Subject: Re: FYI: gdb/common/Makefile calling aclocal & autoconf... Message-ID: <20110307095003.GS30306@adacore.com> References: <20110306045412.GL30306@adacore.com> <201103061004.p26A476B018601@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20110307044838.GO30306@adacore.com> <20110307051131.GB31964@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110307051131.GB31964@host1.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00432.txt.bz2 > I would be for: > Re: Change gdb/common/ to use Automake > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-02/msg00493.html > > with a hope for gdb/Makefile.am later; but I have enough other patches > to work on myself. I am not opposed to the experiment, but I would defer that for later, after we have stabilized the situation (and after we've branched 7.3!). It would also be interesting to verify that automake solves some of the issues that we actually faced - I don't know automake much... -- Joel