From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16309 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 04:39:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 16299 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 04:39:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 04:39:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1763B2BAFA6; Sun, 6 Mar 2011 23:39:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ucjTJWN+6xNM; Sun, 6 Mar 2011 23:39:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9432BAFA3; Sun, 6 Mar 2011 23:39:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A54C1459AD; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 08:39:23 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 05:05:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix spurious FAIL in py-inferior.exp (x86-solaris) Message-ID: <20110307043923.GN30306@adacore.com> References: <1299238268-32142-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <201103041218.p24CI1vS028257@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <201103041227.04761.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103041227.04761.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00418.txt.bz2 > On Friday 04 March 2011 12:18:01, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > That's a bug in the Solaris thread support. So... > > It's by design. Consequence of the M:N support, IIRC. > (I didn't design it!) So, are we OK with this patch? Thanks, -- Joel