From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9200 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2011 04:11:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 9171 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2011 04:11:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 04:11:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p254B7mD022853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:11:07 -0500 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p254B57H026004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:11:07 -0500 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p254B51S001366; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 05:11:05 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p254B3P2031489; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 05:11:03 +0100 Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 04:11:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: Marc Khouzam , "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" Subject: Re: [patch] [gdbserver] Do not crash on file load without inferior Message-ID: <20110305041102.GA16509@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110224114001.GA24673@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201103042132.52768.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110304213728.GA16487@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201103042205.51281.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103042205.51281.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00361.txt.bz2 On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:05:50 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Are you saying you didn't have a chance of thinking about > my rationale, or that you don't agree with my rationale, > or that you wanted to write a better test, or? I could find some examples from the past (not sure if specifically for your fixes or not - I do not find relevant whether such case happened or not with your fixes) when even despite serious thinking about the problem on the list the testsuite then found for the commit a regression and/or incomplete fix. Given how cheap is to run the testsuite I do not think it is worth spending any human effort on coding without having the testsuite results available. Thanks, Jan