Re: [PATCH v5] sim: bfin: new port

Mike Frysinger
2011-03-02T21:46:44Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 765 bytes --]

On Wednesday, March 02, 2011 04:30:08 Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 March 2011 02:17:22, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > but i'd like to avoid this step when possible, so how about including the
> > generated file too, and adding a makefile target so that it is
> > regenerated whenever the .s changes ?
>
> I don't see where's the chicken&egg

gcc needs an assembler, and that gets compiled with binutils/gdb. so i cant
make binutils/gdb need a compiler.

> but in any case, yep, keeping the
> generated file in the tree is what I was thinking. No need to force
> people to have a build of a bfin compiler/assembler at hand to build the
> host non-bfin gdb.

ok, i'll put this together. shouldnt take long.

any other feedback ? :)
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]