From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21709 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2011 07:40:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 21700 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2011 07:40:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 07:40:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251342BB06E; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:40:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8TiXPyrmB9as; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:40:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F43E2BB06A; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:40:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0E1AF145A56; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:39:49 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:09:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Michael Snyder , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFC] Compile GDB with -Wshadow? (was: "Re: [rfa] function parameter shadowed by local variable in opencl-lang.c") Message-ID: <20110228073949.GF30306@adacore.com> References: <4D698B92.3070309@vmware.com> <4D698C33.9040101@vmware.com> <20110228045225.GC30306@adacore.com> <20110228045735.GD30306@adacore.com> <20110228050759.GA25029@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110228050759.GA25029@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00882.txt.bz2 > That would be great but it produces now 627 errors, I am not going to fix > them, they look each one needs a specific fix. :-(. Completely impractical at this stage. It's really surprising that we would have so many errors of this kind... -- Joel