From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28123 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2011 11:55:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 28114 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2011 11:55:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_WT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:55:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C538D2BAE8F; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:55:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kXQHCUpoA4xj; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:55:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593FE2BAE8E; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:55:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3511A145A56; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:55:39 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jerome Guitton Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] document the new VxWorks port Message-ID: <20110225115539.GG2495@adacore.com> References: <1298569763-18784-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1298569763-18784-19-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <838vx5rzf8.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225102624.GB3211@adacore.com> <83ipw8qsfe.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225112647.GA2254@adacore.com> <83d3mgqr7y.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225114413.GF2495@adacore.com> <20110225114943.GB2254@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110225114943.GB2254@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00752.txt.bz2 > Not sure that it would make this much clearer, as "info tasks" exists > as well. An other source of confusion here is that "task" means > also something different in Ada. But at the same time, we're saying threads when we really mean "VxWorks Tasks", no? I think that the "wtx" prefix in the command might help make things clearer. Otherwise, how about "info wtx vxworks-tasks"? -- Joel