From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26770 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2011 11:49:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 26762 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2011 11:49:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TW_WT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:49:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F71CB01F7; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:49:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFe-C-Bm1J9F; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:49:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from province.act-europe.fr (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214]) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFE7CB027A; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:49:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 560) id 80BC5164829; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:49:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:55:00 -0000 From: Jerome Guitton To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] document the new VxWorks port Message-ID: <20110225114943.GB2254@adacore.com> References: <1298569763-18784-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1298569763-18784-19-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <838vx5rzf8.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225102624.GB3211@adacore.com> <83ipw8qsfe.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225112647.GA2254@adacore.com> <83d3mgqr7y.fsf@gnu.org> <20110225114413.GF2495@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110225114413.GF2495@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00751.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker (brobecker@adacore.com): > I think it makes sense. Perhaps, the confusion comes from the > "info wtx threads" command itself, since it is not listing threads, > but rather *tasks* (this is the technical term that WRS uses). > We could change that command to "info wtx tasks"... But if we do, > I'd to request that we also provide an alias to preserve compatibility > with the current users. Not sure that it would make this much clearer, as "info tasks" exists as well. An other source of confusion here is that "task" means also something different in Ada.