From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-78655-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21441 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2011 18:58:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 21432 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2011 18:58:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:58:49 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p1OIwLv6003716;	Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:58:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p1OIwIQ9023958;	Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:58:18 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:01:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201102241858.p1OIwIQ9023958@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
CC: msnyder@vmware.com, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20110224182546.GC2495@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker	on Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:25:46 +0400)
Subject: Re: [rfa] make clean should remove observe.h and observer.inc
References: <4D6429F5.3030209@vmware.com> <4D657DB3.80807@vmware.com> <m3bp21h5js.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4D669D92.2090005@vmware.com> <20110224182546.GC2495@adacore.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00722.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:25:46 +0400
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> > That brings up another question.  What about <lang>-exp.c?  Technically
> > they are generated files.  Should make clean remove them?
> 
> I would say no - we check them in so to allow users to build
> GDB without requiring bison/flex. It would be problematic for
> them if they disappeared at a simple "make clean".

Indeed; "make clean" should not remove any files that are included in
the GDB release tarball.