From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-78566-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12588 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2011 03:46:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 12580 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2011 03:46:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 03:46:33 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2212BAC3D;	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:46:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with LMTP id i1YQxdoX7FW8; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:46:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EC12BAB5C;	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:46:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)	id 873321459B0; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:46:22 +0400 (RET)
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:01:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,	Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>,	"dan@codesourcery.com" <dan@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] add test for memattr, use get_number_or_range for memattr commands
Message-ID: <20110223034622.GS2600@adacore.com>
References: <4D605267.8030708@vmware.com> <20110221091304.GB2600@adacore.com> <m3zkppsa69.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4D62EE87.6040902@vmware.com> <20110222082747.GQ2600@adacore.com> <4D63F936.2000505@vmware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D63F936.2000505@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00633.txt.bz2

> Hmmm, how about if I initialize mem1start etc. to -1?
> Then the rest of the tests will fail but not crash.
> Is that better?

Yep, that would work for me. You could also do something like this:

    if {![info exists mem1start] || ![info exists mem2start] ...} {
        fail "..."
        # No point in continuing the rest of the testcase if we couldn't
        # get the addresses we need bla bla bla.
        return
    }

-- 
Joel