From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10040 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2011 10:13:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 10031 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2011 10:13:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:13:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4082BABDB; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:13:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0eYMFUkYPY0t; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:13:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835112BAB4F; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:13:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB5501459B0; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:13:11 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:22:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit/Ada] Fix unconstrained packed array size Message-ID: <20110221101311.GF2600@adacore.com> References: <1297925036-2762-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20110217215803.GA30633@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20110218032426.GF15527@adacore.com> <20110218205823.GA1001@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20110221082121.GA2600@adacore.com> <20110221082823.GA32289@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110221082823.GA32289@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00534.txt.bz2 > > gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > * gdb.ada/packed_array.exp: Add xfail for "print u_var" if > > the debugger is unable to find the array bounds. > > OK, I find it better this way. Thanks (and thanks for sending the binaries, allowing me to reproduce the problem). The patch is now in. -- Joel