On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:45:58 +0100, Michael Snyder wrote:
> You're right, there is an extra .* in there.
> Can you please try the attached?

It still FAILs.  Shouldn't there be \[^\r\n\]* instead of \[\r\n\]*?
BTW i7-920 (4 cores + hyperthreading), Fedora 15 x86_64.

Attaching also my attempt first today but I haven't finished it to a state to
make it running as I have too much stuff to do here now.

BTW I do not like any .* there in such unanchored regexes, it is still too
fragile while it may not cause problems right now.  The part ". 3 .*\"... can
match almost anything, some random digit between 1 to 6 can possibly appear
somewhere and it can eat some text again.


Thanks,
Jan