From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27540 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2011 22:25:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 27532 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2011 22:25:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:24:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 9009 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 22:24:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 16 Feb 2011 22:24:54 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: FYI: handle DW_OP_call_frame_cfa in AX compiler Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:27:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-25-generic; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Jan Kratochvil References: <201102071435.20804.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201102162125.44378.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102162224.45388.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00399.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 16 February 2011 21:40:04, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > > Pedro> OOC, why the dwarf2_compile_ftype abstraction? Are you working > Pedro> on other changes where you'll pass down something else? > > Nope, I just didn't want to make compile_dwarf_to_ax public. > Maybe it is better to just do that. > What do you think? IMO, that'd be better. Stops everyone else reading the code from asking that same question in their minds. :-) -- Pedro Alves