Re: [obv] Merge gdb/common/Changelog to gdb/ChangeLog [Re: [rfa/rfc] Build libcommon.a for gdb and gdbserver]

Yao Qi
2011-02-17T02:06:49Z

On 02/17/2011 03:55 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Anyway, common will definitely be part of gdb, at least from my point of
> view. gdb won't build without it. Changes in common will require
> changes in gdb. Plus, it is in a subdirectory of gdb.

Yes, common is not only part of gdb, but also part of gdbserver. My
original logic is that "since gdb and gdbserver has its own changelog,
common, as a common part of both, _should_ have its own changelog.
Changes in common should affect both".

Taking the semi-agreement Stan mentioned into account, I am OK to leave
common change entries in gdb/ChangeLog

--
Yao (é½å°§)